Wednesday, November 18, 2009

New PHR To Let Patients See What Their Doctor Sees

Note: Practice Fusion announced today that it released Patient Fusion, a personal health record with real time links to the company’s electronic health record. Patient Fusion users will be able to see actual clinical data as it appears in the record being kept by their doctor.
______

In 1895, German physicist Wilhelm Rontgen stumbled upon an image that had been created when X-rays passed through his wife's hand and then exposed a photographic plate. The image revealed the bones and soft tissue of her hand in exquisite detail. No one had even dreamed this was possible.

Rontgen’s discovery was extremely significant, in part because it helped drive an unprecedented social transformation of medicine in which physicians rose from humble wage-earners in a cottage industry to prestigious professionals who sat atop gigantic health systems.

Physicians occupied the pinnacle because they could make sense out of those wondrous images. Laymen trusted them to explain their hidden meaning, as they did in later years when it came to the interpretation of lab tests, EKGs, and so forth.

But while Rontgen’s contribution remains clear and unquestioned to this day, the image of the omnipotent physician has faded like a daguerreotype.

There are many reasons for the fall. Nowadays for example, anyone who can jump on the Internet can access more medical information in seconds than a physician can digest in a lifetime.

But we’ll defer the patient-empowerment story for another day. Today we focus on something less glamorous but no less important. It is the fact that modern health care systems built to support physicians have accumulated so much complexity that they are bound to fail.

Take for example, a report from a few months back showing that 18% of EHR-generated alerts designed to inform physicians about radiology reports that specified serious or life threatening results were never opened by physicians. Nearly 8% of the stricken patients did not receive timely follow-up and their conditions worsened.

As another example, Cornell researchers recently reviewed laboratory test results from patients cared for at 23 primary care practices. Of all patients in all practices who had a “significant” abnormal result, 7% were never notified by their caregivers. In one practice, 26% of these patients were never notified.

Furthermore, the scientists found that implementation of an EHR had no impact on these results.

According to the scientists, the only thing that favorably impacted results was a good process for managing test results. They suggested that in such a process:
(1) All results are routed to a single, responsible physician who signs off on them.
(2) The practice informs all patients of all results (good or bad).
(3) The practice documents that the patient has been informed.
(4) Patients are told to call the practice after a specific time interval if they have not heard about their results.

If all practices adopted a process like this, notification errors would be reduced but there would still be room for improvement. Harried physicians often go days at a time without checking their patients' lab results. There will still be communication errors, as when voice mails are overlooked or mistranslated. And step 4 in the above process is a poor fail-safe mechanism, since patients will forget to call, or be too afraid, or assume (despite warnings not to) that “no news is good news.”

Personal health records (PHRs) can improve this process, but only if the PHR is linked to the EHR being used by the physician. In this instance, the patient can instantly check his or her lab results. Secure messaging can be used to ask questions or communicate additional information.

The PHRs offered by Google and Microsoft fail totally in this respect. In fact, Kaiser Permanante offers the only PHR that is linked in real time to an EHR.

In Q1 2009 alone, Kaiser patients viewed more than 5 million test results on its PHR. They had access to the information at the same moment their physicians did. And the data they saw was as pristine and accurate as Rontgen’s view of his wife’s hand more than a century ago.

With today’s release of a free PHR that is linked in real time to a free EHR, the rest of us can finally get up to speed.

Glenn Laffel MD, PhD
Sr. Vice President, Clinical Affairs, Practice Fusion

7 comments:

Bernz on November 18, 2009 1:36 PM said...

you know I love your product, but you say that other than KP, you're the only phr that links with and emr? What about BIDMC's patientsite? Or the one from harvard vanguard that's based on epic and has a phr interface? Aren't these emr's with phr's integrated?

Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD on November 18, 2009 2:19 PM said...

Oops...I should have said "the only one I know of" ...(assuming you're right).

Still, my point stands. Practice Fusion is democratizing health care by offering these products for free.

We are opening up new possibiliies for the vast majority of providers (big and small) that don't have the resources to offer these kinds of products on their own.

Maybe we can help the non-Harvards and the the non-Kaisers of the world improve their performance, and benefit their patients along the way.

BIDMC and Harvard Vanguard want to grow their businesses. They have cash and are using it to differentiate themselves in the market (as they should).

As an entrepreneur yourself, you know quite well what it's like to compete against better capitalized opponents.

--Glenn

Anonymous said...

I know you've been hard at work, and I do very much appreciate it, but...

I just logged into the PHR. Still no ability that I can see to allow my patients to email me or upload information for me to put in the chart. But by golly, they can see their immunizations!

I don't know about anyone else's practice, but mine needs integration of email so that everything is not in a separate system that needs to be transferred into the record. It's a problem that wastes time and is a compliance nightmare. That is the solution I, and my patients need first, hands down. It is a basic of practice these days. I've used Kaiser's system extensively. It does email correspondence very well.

I've been asking for this for a loooong time, so I'm very disappointed. And by the way, I have seen another very intricate system that links emr and phr, together with capacity to even store things such as audio phone messages. It's not free and it's not as clean and intuitive, but it's got the elements.

Bernz on November 19, 2009 8:24 AM said...

"Maybe we can help the non-Harvards and the the non-Kaisers of the world improve their performance, and benefit their patients along the way."

Bingo! That's the value-add. That's the special sauce of PF. All those doctors and patients who look at Epic's really nice install at the Harvard Vanguard system and say, "well that's great, but we don't need all that. And we sure as heck can't pay millions. But we really do like some of these features..."

And that's the (rather large) niche I think you're involved in. And that's why I think you'll have success.

You're not the only one.. but you're the only affordable one. I DO think you might be the only one that's a multi-tenant environment, allowing you to be a self-contained HIE.

Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD on November 19, 2009 1:24 PM said...

In response to Anonymous:

Thanks for your interest! This is the initial launch of our PHR. It will be soon followed by more releases with features for patients to send messages, upload data, share their information, request appointments, etc.

It took Kaiser 5 years and $5 billion to get where they are today. We pumped out what you now see in Patient Fusion in a bit over 4 months. Give us a few more months and we’ll have all the features you're requesting.

Thanks, Glenn

Anonymous said...

Sorry to be a nag, but I'm not sure PF really "gets" the urgent importance of COMMUNICATION. There are all sorts of services that already allow messaging between patients and their physicians. It doesn't seem like it should be that hard to do. I don't understand the back burnering of this critical piece.

But again, I do appreciate what you are doing.

Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD on November 21, 2009 7:35 AM said...

In response to Anonymous:

You are not a nag! We see that you care a lot about what we are doing. We would like to speak with you directly so we can better understand your requirements and see what we can do about them.

Please contact us at support@practicefusion.com or 415.494.0990.

Tell 'em Glenn sent ya!

Thanks,
Glenn

Search EHR Bloggers

Search here

Meet the EHR Experts

Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD - Dr. Laffel is a physician with a PhD in Health Policy from MIT. He serves as Practice Fusion's Senior VP, Clinical Affairs.

Robert Rowley, MD - Dr. Rowley is a family practice physician and Practice Fusion’s Chief Medical Officer.

Follow Us On

   

Practice Fusion on Twitter

About Practice Fusion

Insight from doctors and industry leaders on EHR and healthcare IT topics. Free, web-based Electronic Health Record solutions from Practice Fusion.

http://www.practicefusion.com

Categories

Blog Archive